Shortcuts

/
focus the search box
Escape
leave the search, or close a menu or this
r
cycle the refresh interval
t
cycle the theme
?
this list

← Failures

Where it stands

build failed, ours is 2.5-1+py315.2.

Nothing recorded is waiting on this one.

What was sent

aborted, 2.5-1+py315.2, as work request 1347665, which ended in work request 1347667.

Which turned out to be build-failed: the workflow ended: build-failed, work request 1347667.

Sent before this one: 2.5-1+py315.1. A version that was sent is spent, whatever came of it.

What is known

QuestionAnswerSaid byAs of
Why did the build fail? unknown
The log was read and says nothing this tool recognises. These are the failures somebody has to look at.
deps/11 not dated
does Debian's own test suite pass? not tested by debian
Debian runs no autopkgtest for this, so we have no independent baseline: nothing here distinguishes a failure this interpreter caused from one the package always had
ci.debian.net not dated
has anybody reported this under the usertag? 1 bug
somebody has already reported this under the round's usertag, so it is tracked; the tag is the only record connecting what was sent to what this tracks
#1120194 staticsite: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.13 returned exit code 13
the BTS usertag not dated

Runs

VersionArchKindResultBinariesInterpretersClosureFinished
2.5-1+py315.2 all build fail unknown not read yet — 2026-09-25 03:55
2.5-1+py315.1 all build fail unknown not read yet — 2026-08-25 06:44