0.70.19-3 in the archive
not needed yet,
ours is 0.70.19-2.1+py315.2.
archive has moved on; rebuild before believing this
Nothing recorded is waiting on this one.
aborted,
0.70.19-3+py315.1,
as work request 1501674,
which ended in work request 1501722.
Which turned out to be publish-refused: the workflow ended: publish-refused, work request 1501722.
Sent before this one:
0.70.19-2+py315.1.
A version that was sent is spent, whatever came of it.
| Question | Answer | Said by | As of |
|---|---|---|---|
| do Debian's own tests pass? |
archive tests fail
Debian's own tests for this package fail in unstable, so this failure is not the new interpreter's doing. debci answers about the source rather than about the version we rebuilt, which is why the date its run happened is shown. amd64, arm64, last run 2026-08-17 |
ci.debian.net | not dated |
| has anybody reported this under the usertag? |
1 bug
somebody has already reported this under the round's usertag, so it is tracked; the tag is the only record connecting what was sent to what this tracks #1146809 (done) multiprocess: FTBFS against python 3.15rc2 |
the BTS usertag | not dated |
No run in this phase yet — it is not needed yet.