1.29.0-3 in the archive, ships a compiled extension
tests failed,
ours is 1.29.0-3+py315.d.1.
python3-dev-only
build-depend on python3-all-dev instead of python3-dev
Nothing recorded is waiting on this one.
published,
1.29.0-3+py315.d.1,
as work request 1298786.
| Question | Answer | Said by | As of |
|---|---|---|---|
| do Debian's own tests pass? |
archive tests fail
Debian's own tests for this package fail in unstable, so this failure is not the new interpreter's doing. debci answers about the source rather than about the version we rebuilt, which is why the date its run happened is shown. amd64, arm64, last run 2026-08-17 |
ci.debian.net | not dated |
| has anybody reported this under the usertag? |
1 bug
somebody has already reported this under the round's usertag, so it is tracked; the tag is the only record connecting what was sent to what this tracks #1145591 meep: FTBFS: typemap_utils.cpp:494:18: error: 'PyInt_AsLong' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'PyLong_AsLong'? |
the BTS usertag | not dated |
| Version | Arch | Kind | Result | Binaries | Interpreters | Closure | Finished |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.29.0-3+py315.d.1
|
arm64 | test | fail | rebuilt | named none | — | 2026-09-17 08:30 |
1.29.0-3+py315.d.1
|
amd64 | test | fail | rebuilt | named none | — | 2026-09-17 08:14 |
1.29.0-3
|
arm64 | test | pass | the archive's (reference arm) | 3.14, 3.15 | — | 2026-09-17 03:37 |
1.29.0-3
|
amd64 | test | pass | the archive's (reference arm) | 3.14, 3.15 | — | 2026-09-17 03:37 |
1.29.0-3+py315.d.1
|
arm64 | build | pass | unknown | not read yet | — | 2026-09-17 08:28 |
1.29.0-3+py315.d.1
|
amd64 | build | pass | unknown | not read yet | — | 2026-09-17 08:13 |