Shortcuts

/
focus the search box
Escape
leave the search, or close a menu or this
r
cycle the refresh interval
t
cycle the theme
?
this list

← All states

Where it stands

built, ours is 0.9.1+dfsg1-3+py315.1.

Nothing recorded is waiting on this one.

What was sent

published, 0.9.1+dfsg1-3+py315.1, as work request 1090289, which ended in work request 1090297.

Which turned out to be build-failed: the build failed: work request 1090297.

What is known

QuestionAnswerSaid byAs of
Why did the build fail? unsatisfiable-in-sid
a build dependency nothing in Debian satisfies, so the package is unbuildable for anybody: an RC bug this transition merely noticed
deps/11 not dated
does Debian's own test suite pass? neutral
Debian runs no autopkgtest for this, so we have no independent baseline: nothing here distinguishes a failure this interpreter caused from one the package always had
ci.debian.net not dated

Runs

VersionArchKindResultBinariesInterpretersClosureFinished
0.9.1+dfsg1-3+py315.1 amd64 test pass rebuilt named none — 2026-09-06 18:30
0.9.1+dfsg1-3+py315.1 all build pass unknown not read yet — 2026-09-06 16:45
0.9.1+dfsg1-3 amd64 test pass archive 3.13, 3.14, 3.15 — 2026-08-23 03:17
0.9.1+dfsg1-3+py315.1 all build fail unknown not read yet — 2026-08-23 07:34