Shortcuts

/
focus the search box
Escape
leave the search, or close a menu or this
r
cycle the refresh interval
t
cycle the theme
?
this list

← All states

Where it stands

built, ours is 5.0.8-1.1~+py315.2.
ahead of the archive (built from a source sid does not have)

Nothing recorded is waiting on this one.

What was sent

published, 5.0.8-1+py315.1, as work request 1105826.

What is known

QuestionAnswerSaid byAs of
Why did the build fail? unknown
The log was read and says nothing this tool recognises. These are the failures somebody has to look at.
deps/11 not dated
Which known interpreter change does this failure show? tests-failed
the test suite failed, cause not narrowed. The tests failed under the new interpreter and nothing here recognises why.
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
deps/11 not dated
does Debian's own test suite pass? not tested by debian
Debian runs no autopkgtest for this, so we have no independent baseline: nothing here distinguishes a failure this interpreter caused from one the package always had
ci.debian.net not dated
has anybody reported this under the usertag? 1 bug
somebody has already reported this under the round's usertag, so it is tracked; the tag is the only record connecting what was sent to what this tracks
#1148796 exabgp: FTBFS against python 3.15rc2
the BTS usertag not dated

Runs

VersionArchKindResultBinariesInterpretersClosureFinished
5.0.8-1.1~+py315.2 amd64 test pass rebuilt named none — 2026-09-22 13:30
5.0.8-1.1~+py315.2 all build pass unknown not read yet — 2026-09-22 13:29
5.0.8-1 amd64 test pass archive 3.13, 3.14, 3.15 — 2026-08-24 15:24
5.0.8-1+py315.1 all build fail unknown not read yet — 2026-08-24 18:04