Shortcuts

/
focus the search box
Escape
leave the search, or close a menu or this
r
cycle the refresh interval
t
cycle the theme
?
this list

← Failures

Where it stands

build failed, ours is 26.2-1+py315.2.

Nothing recorded is waiting on this one.

What was sent

aborted, 26.2-1+py315.2, as work request 1345993, which ended in work request 1345995.

Which turned out to be build-failed: the workflow ended: build-failed, work request 1345995.

Sent before this one: 26.2-1+py315.1. A version that was sent is spent, whatever came of it.

What is known

QuestionAnswerSaid byAs of
Why did the build fail? unknown
The log was read and says nothing this tool recognises. These are the failures somebody has to look at.
deps/11 not dated
Which known interpreter change does this failure show? tests-failed
the test suite failed, cause not narrowed. The tests failed under the new interpreter and nothing here recognises why.
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
deps/11 not dated
does Debian's own test suite pass? not tested by debian
Debian runs no autopkgtest for this, so we have no independent baseline: nothing here distinguishes a failure this interpreter caused from one the package always had
ci.debian.net not dated
has anybody reported this under the usertag? 1 bug
somebody has already reported this under the round's usertag, so it is tracked; the tag is the only record connecting what was sent to what this tracks
#1149376 cloud-init: FTBFS against python 3.15rc2 (Day of month directive '%d' may not be used without a year directive)
the BTS usertag not dated

Runs

VersionArchKindResultBinariesInterpretersClosureFinished
26.2-1+py315.2 all build fail unknown not read yet — 2026-09-24 23:30
26.2-1+py315.1 all build fail unknown not read yet — 2026-08-28 17:19