6.0.0-4 in the archive, ships a compiled extension
waiting,
waiting on gdcm, vtk9.
python3-dev-only
build-depend on python3-all-dev instead of python3-dev
Nothing recorded is waiting on this one.
Nothing has been sent for this package in this stage. The stage is what a submission is recorded under, so another stage's is on that stage's page.
| Question | Answer | Said by | As of |
|---|---|---|---|
| does the archive build this version? |
archive ftbfs
Debian's own rebuild of the version the archive carries fails too, so this failure is not the new interpreter's doing. It still blocks the transition: nobody can rebuild it until that is fixed. amd64 |
tests.reproducible-builds.org | not dated |
| do Debian's own tests pass? |
archive tests fail
Debian's own tests for this package fail in unstable, so this failure is not the new interpreter's doing. debci answers about the source rather than about the version we rebuilt, which is why the date its run happened is shown. amd64, arm64, last run 2026-08-17 |
ci.debian.net | not dated |
| has anybody reported this under the usertag? |
1 bug
somebody has already reported this under the round's usertag, so it is tracked; the tag is the only record connecting what was sent to what this tracks #1145144 camitk: FTBFS: HDF5 was found, but a different variable was set which contains the location of the `hdf5::hdf5_hl` library. |
the BTS usertag | not dated |
No run in this phase yet — it is waiting.