Shortcuts

/
focus the search box
Escape
leave the search, or close a menu or this
r
cycle the refresh interval
t
cycle the theme
?
this list

← Interpreter coverage

Where it stands

no rebuild needed.

Rebuilding it releases 1 package waiting on it, as this stage last counted.

What was sent

Nothing has been sent for this package in this stage. The stage is what a submission is recorded under, so another stage's is on that stage's page.

What is known

QuestionAnswerSaid byAs of
does the archive build this version? archive ftbfs
Debian's own rebuild of the version the archive carries fails too, so this failure is not the new interpreter's doing. It still blocks the transition: nobody can rebuild it until that is fixed.
amd64
arm64
tests.reproducible-builds.org not dated
does Debian's own test suite pass? not tested by debian
Debian runs no autopkgtest for this, so we have no independent baseline: nothing here distinguishes a failure this interpreter caused from one the package always had
ci.debian.net not dated
has anybody reported this under the usertag? 1 bug
somebody has already reported this under the round's usertag, so it is tracked; the tag is the only record connecting what was sent to what this tracks
#1058292 aioredis: FTBFS: FAILED tests/multi_exec_test.py::test_global_loop
the BTS usertag not dated

Runs

No run in this phase yet — it is no rebuild needed.